With another year coming to a close and winter weather setting in, the FLCLASS team is huddled up at our office, discussing how to further improve our services to the more than 100 valued Participants from Tallahassee to Clearwater, Hollywood to Dunedin, and everywhere in between. As we reflect upon all that we learned this year, we thought it would be helpful to share the frequent questions we receive about our methodology for determining the value of assets held within the portfolio for reporting purposes.
Local government investment pools (LGIP) may select different methods of determining the value of assets held within the portfolio for reporting purposes. The two most common methods used to report on the assets of the portfolio are mark-to-market (Fair Value) and amortized cost. While both methods are acceptable, we believe mark-to-market provides a higher level of transparency than amortized cost.
Why does FLCLASS use the mark-to-market methodology?
Put simply, we believe that transparency is a critical component of the investment of all public funds, and mark-to-market is essential to that transparency.
The mark-to-market methodology involves obtaining prices for securities in the portfolio on a daily or frequent basis. In the case of FLCLASS, the portfolio is priced every business day. The prices are based on what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller for the individual positions in the portfolio. When completed routinely while using prices from reliable sources, readers of the financial statements gain an understanding of the liquidity and credit quality of the positions in the portfolio.
Mark-to-market reflects current economic and monetary cycles that may have a direct impact on the underlying values of the portfolio. Changes in the rating or perceived credit quality of the insurer will be immediately reflected in the value of the securities held in the portfolio. When securities are marked-to-market on a daily basis, Participants are able to see the real-time integrity of the safety, liquidity, and yield structure at the core of the FLCLASS portfolio.
Alternatively, LGIPs employing the amortized cost method adjust the value of the securities in the portfolio daily by a predetermined amount from the purchase date to the maturity date. This method produces very predictable asset valuations regardless of current economic or monetary cycles, and the predetermined value may or may not reflect the actual price achievable in the open market. As a result, many LGIP portfolios that utilize the amortized cost method will still periodically use mark-to-market to reflect the prices more accurately.
Does FLCLASS calculate the net asset value on an amortized cost basis?
Though FLCLASS does not calculate net asset value (NAV) on an amortized cost basis, that does not mean FLCLASS does not maintain a NAV of $1.00. Instead, FLCLASS calculates NAV in a manner that requires significant daily managerial and operational bandwidth, something every pool manager may not have. The FLCLASS portfolio operates as a $1.00 stable NAV fund.
For pricing and redeeming shares, FLCLASS calculates the NAV of $1.00 per share using the mark-to-market methodology. We believe that the amortized cost method is not the best representation of a portfolio’s true market value as it does not reflect current economic and monetary cycles. While the two different methods will approximate one another during periods of stability in the financial markets, the results are often much different during the inevitable periods of market stress.
In our five years of service to Florida governmental entities, FLCLASS has continuously maintained a stable NAV of $1.00. We are dedicated to preserving the principal of and generating competitive returns for governmental entities, and it is our laser-focus on safety, liquidity, and yield that gives FLCLASS Participants peace-of-mind, knowing we will remain steadfast in those practices.
For more information, please contact the FLCLASS relationship team.
